Using social badges that measure face to face interaction on the microscopic level allow us to predict patterns of collaboration and gain insights into how we work together on levels not possible before. At the MIT Center for Collective Intelligence we have recently experimented with what we call microscopic dynamic social network analysis.
GPS satellite based navigation systems tell us where we are and how to get where we want to go. In our research we used a similar people-based social navigation system develop at the MIT Medial Lab by Sandy Pentland’s team to better understand our position in social networks. Using social badges - body-worn sensors - we measured physical interaction of co-located people to better understand who they are, and therefore allow them to better navigate in their own social network.
In a research project with 22 study subjects, who wore the badges during work for one month, we were able to predict social characteristics such as extroversion, neuroticism, openness, and agreeability based on microscopic social network analysis. We obtained control measures of these values with a standard psychological test NEO-FFI). High contribution index was positively correlated with extroversion, and negatively correlated with neuroticism. This means that the more people looked their communication partners into the face, the more of an extrovert they were. The less they looked them into the eyes, the higher was their score on the neuroticism test. Fluctuation in betweenness centrality was positively correlated with openness, and negatively correlated with agreeability. In less scientific language: the more they changed between being in the center of the conversation, and by withdrawing into their offices, the more open to new things they were. The steadier their communication pattern, either as a socialite or a recluse, the higher their agreability score. We were also able to obtain correlation between social network position and job satisfaction, and extroversion.
Of course this technology has to be used very carefully, to avoid the risk of intruding into the privacy of the individual. In our project we have alleviated this risk by only sharing individual results with each affected individual, and giving a condensed view without individual identification to management. So far study participants have reacted very positively to the insights they gained about their own communication behavior.
Microscopic social network analysis can be used to complement proven psychological tests such as the FFI. It could be used, e.g. as a further input to identify people suitable for certain professions, for example identifying the most agreeable candidates among potential recruits as police officers. By simply wearing social badges, a user will finally be able to answer question like “Do I have more of an introvert or an extrovert communication style? What personality types do I have to bring into a meeting to make it more productive? How can I change my personal communication behavior to be more efficient? What leadership styles are most effective for a certain situation?” We hope that future research will help organizations become more innovative and productive by exploring their hidden social structures in a virtual mirror – helping members of an organization to better understand their hidden social characteristics to improve the overall organization.
|
||||||
|
Join IAOC
Login
Search
This Month
Month Archive
|
“Mirror mirror on a chip, tell me who is the most hip…?”
by
Peter A. Gloor
on Mon 24 Sep 2007 04:29 PM EDT | Permanent Link
Keywords:
show,
networking,
MIT,
innovation,
ethics,
creative,
communication,
collaboration,
business,
academic
Comments
Re: “Mirror mirror on a chip, tell me who is the most hip…?”
Peter,
Thank you for sharing your research here. I'm going to try to get this to the layperson's level even more. 1. You screened all these employees using a modified Myers-Briggs personality assessment tool to see how their personalities correlated with their office interactions. 2. You put infrared sensors on people and tracked how often they interacted with other people in the office -- which is a scary thing to do. 3. The sensors only activate if people look directly at each other. If they are near to each other but not facing each other, it doesn't count as interaction. 4. You also analyzed the number of email interactions between employees, correct? Some interesting conclusions/questions I pulled from your report -- and correct me if I am wrong here: * People are, for the most part, equally as gregarious in email as in person. * What can you tell us about how performance or valuation correlated with interaction? Do extroverted people hold positions of higher authority or earn more salary? Do introverted people get more done? * Do you have any predictions regarding online communications? Do you think voice & video will make online communications more effective? What about people who are super well-connected online but have very few in-person social interactions -- does your data indicate that this stereotype of the geek is probably inaccurate -- that people well-connected online are probably also well-connected in person? With Thanks, STEVE O'KEEFE Re: Re: “Mirror mirror on a chip, tell me who is the most hip…?”
Steve,
Thanks a lot for translating my geek-talk into understandable language. Your assumptions are correct. Let me just add a few clarifications: 1. Most people have indeed the same personality online and face-to-face. There are a few exceptions, which are quite interesting. For example some strong introverts which are heavy e-mail users are quite creative. 2. We have just scratched the surface as far as correlating performance with face-to-face interaction patterns on the team level goes. So far we have only been able to predict psychological characteristics through analyzing face-to-face communication patterns. 3. We did not find a correlation between extroversion and higher salaries. On the opposite, we found empirical evidence that moderately introvert people are more popular than strong extroverts. 4. I am convinced that these microscopic social analysis tools have the same potential to revolutionize social navigation as the car navigation system changed the way how we navigate on the road. Re: Re: Re: “Mirror mirror on a chip, tell me who is the most hip…?”
Peter,
I am very curious how the personality test correlated to analysis of sensors and the e-mail analysis? That is, if they yield identical results, you would not need employees to complete personality assessment tools if you can just analyze their email interactions and glean the same information. STEVE Re: Re: Re: Re: “Mirror mirror on a chip, tell me who is the most hip…?”
Steve,
you are absolutely right - that's the main conclusion from our project. I would like to emphasize again that what we did is a first experiment which needs further verification, but if we can indeed confirm our results, we will be able to obtain individual personality characteristics by just wearing social badges around our neck for a few days. My vision is to combine such readings for teams, and find out which personality types will make the most productive teams for different types of tasks - but still a very long way to go, we have barely scratched the surface. Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: “Mirror mirror on a chip, tell me who is the most hip…?”
Peter,
You mention optimizing the personality spectrum of teams. As I fuzzily recall from your book, "Coolhunting," with Scott Cooper, teams function better when they contain non-experts. Might this also be true for team personality -- that teams function better when you throw a random team member into the mix? Can you imagine recruiting people to be random members on other people's teams? Thanks for the lively discussion. STEVE O'KEEFE Trackbacks
TrackBack URL: |
IAOC Sponsors Become an IAOCblog.com sponsor Recent Articles
Favorite Blogs
Morty's WordRider Blog |
||||