An epic battle is being waged, in cyberspace and, more to the point, in my space -- my office -- over what formats to use for online video.
Until last fall, we made our videos available in the following formats:
QuickTime
MPEG-4
MPEG-1
RealMedia (hi res & lo res)
Windows Media (hi res & lo res)
Your consumer looks at that list and goes, "Huh?" How do you know which one to click? So we installed a nifty little applet that would ping a browser's config and -- presto! -- serve up the perfect video for that user. However, many people behind firewalls will not let the applet ping their systems, and so they can't access the video, even though they have the right gear.
This fall, Apple made life easier on us in many ways by introducing the video iPod and making it compatible with only two different file formats. The codec we use is called "QuickTime MPEG-4, AAC". A codec is an algorithm that contains instructions for compressing and decompressing video. The main ratio we look at when choosing a codec is the clarity compared with the file size. The codec we use results in incredibly small file sizes (2 megabytes/minute) with outstanding clarity on an iPod. Every new generation of codec results in a geometrical improvement in quality and reduction in file size. That's what's really powering the online video revolution: Moore's Law.
So last fall, we started rendering our videos in one format instead of seven. The only problem is, you can't see the videos unless you are running QuickTime 6 or higher. Lots of people cannot see our videos now. So should we render videos in Windows Media or RealMedia or some alternative to make it easier on people?
No.
That's what my tech guru says.
Yes.
That's what my video production manager says.
Me? I'm stuck in the middle. Tomorrow, I'll present some arguments pro and con in this debate.
But I'd like to hear what YOU have to say about it. Have you had experience producing online video? What formats do you prefer? Have you been frustrated trying to use video online? Any pet peeves?
Your's for Smaller Files & Greater Clarity,
STEVE O'KEEFE
V.P. IAOC
President, AuthorViews, Inc.
|
||||
|
Join IAOC
Login
Search
This Month
Month Archive
|
Online Video Formats: .mov .mpg .wmv .omy!
Comments
Re: Online Video Formats: .mov .mpg .wmv .omy!
by
Mordechai (Morty) Schiller
on Tue 21 Feb 2006 08:43 PM EST | Profile | Permanent Link
There's a groundswell of opinion that RealPlayer brings friends to the party: See http://www.spywareinfo.com/articles/ed/2003/06/24.php and http://www.spywareinfo.com/newsletter/archives/0404/30.php
Re: Re: Online Video Formats: .mov .mpg .wmv .omy!
by
Steve O'Keefe
on Wed 22 Feb 2006 08:32 PM EST | Profile | Permanent Link
Morty, I followed your links and they go to ads for spyware software -- a privacy-oriented program. What does that have to do with RealMedia?
Re: Re: Re: Online Video Formats: .mov .mpg .wmv .omy!
by
Mordechai (Morty) Schiller
on Wed 22 Feb 2006 08:51 PM EST | Profile | Permanent Link
Oops. One of the links was an error.
It should have been this post: SWI Forums -> RealPlayer at this link forums.spywareinfo.com/index.php?showtopic=44915 Which has a link to this post: http://www.spywareinfo.com/newsletter/archives/0404/30.php#real Re: Online Video Formats: .mov .mpg .wmv .omy!
by
Albertan
on Mon 12 Mar 2007 02:33 PM EDT | Profile | Permanent Link
I'm just starting to consider how I can use video online for a weekly program I plan to "broadcast" on internet, and I'd like sooner or later to include video clips, and have live "TV" online.
Absolutely I want no techie operations required by viewers, no need to override firewalls or make decisions, just push the button and it runs. Looking at some online video I've seen, especially Utube, I don't like how jerky it is! I get a second (or less) of sound with one frame, and a second of gap, then another frame and sound clip, and a gap. It really does wonders for conversations... or music! (Oh well, my wife says I can't dance.) Years ago I tried TV on shortwave radio. It seems that the best plan is to forget about color (needing much more information per frame)and just send black and white, maybe fewer lines than regular TV (many fewer than high def TV they push for huge screens!) You may need fewer frames per second - please, at least 2 frames/sec. Send it out at a rate that it can be received and seen immediately by most people - not needing to download it slowly, then replaying it, which assumes you have lots of extra memory. (I don't!) Anyhow, I'll want to transmit for a live show, with some call-ins right away. So, what system is best for this? garysem2004@yahoo.ca Re: Re: Online Video Formats: .mov .mpg .wmv .omy!
Gary,
There are so many factors involved in the way video appears over the Internet that it's hard to know where to begin. Let's just say that what you get when you click a link to watch a video is dependent on a huge number of variables that are hard to control. If I were building a web TV show, as you discuss above, here's the kind of set-up I would want: - A "3-chip" digital video camera. These record at at motion picture quality. - Good tripod. - Professional light kit. - Several microphones: lapel mics, stand mics, wireless mics, boom mic. - Digital hard drive for recording and storage. - Final Cut Studio software for editing. - CD/DVD duplicator for quickly making copies of DVDs. Just remember that the problems you experience watching video online could be caused by almost anything. If you start with motion picture quality, you can compress it down for the web. But if you start with crummy cell phone video, it's impossible to upgrade it. Best of Luck, STEVE O'KEEFE Trackbacks
TrackBack URL: |
IAOC Sponsors Become an IAOCblog.com sponsor Recent Articles
Favorite Blogs
Morty's WordRider Blog |
||