It might not be the grad schools, which have some revamping to do to match today's PR job market.
I work in a government public info model environment now, so I went back to school (Rowan) to get re-educated. So what are we grad students getting for our money? Is it up-to-date plates of PR or a dusty curriculum?
For me, it could be less dusty. And that’s not to bash Rowan, which thankfully has Don Dunnington's Online PR course. (Full disclosure: Don is now leading my Online PR independent study. Thanks, Don.) Here’s Rowan's entire MA in PR course load.
The premise of Rowan’s MA in PR, which, at nearly $550 a credit, is: To learn to ask the right people the proper questions, measure their responses and to decide how to disseminate conclusions before repeating the process -- all while writing well. I’m all for that and appreciate the knowledge.
However, course after course neglects technology and the consumers who show an increasing propensity to use it to learn about whatever we might be pitching. Students get foundation en masse. So here we are, in PR 2.0. Right in the thick of it, with conditions ripe for teaching.
But PR 2.0 infrequently visits my PR curriculum. So I ask myself: Am I just getting the degree just to say I have the degree? How PR 1.0-focused should MAs in PR be? For my money, less than they are.
Have some grad schools arrived in 2006? This UGA professor has one answer … Are there others out there? Can anyone bring me the great PR 2.0 courses ... they're out there, right?
(apologies for the original, mangled format. dw)