This week we're going to be tackling a controversial subject, or at least a subject that I think should be controversial because the more I think about it, the more it's clear to me that it's not black and white, not clear: should bloggers accept payment for their efforts?
There are a couple of underlying questions and issues to address prior to us really facing that question, however, and our first discussion topic of the week is bias.
Are you biased?
I bet that most people will say "not with most things" or even "no", but the fact is that each and every one of you is indeed biased, just as I am biased and actually have quite strong biases regarding certain subjects. When I talk about bias, I should clarify that I mean it in the sense of a tendency to skew things in a particular direction, be they controversial or otherwise.
You might be surprised who thinks that we can be unbiased observers, actually. In some sense, that's the foundational belief of professional journalism, for one thing. I remember the times I've contributed to magazines and newspapers where they'd say "you're injecting your opinion, it's no longer just a report of the event". "Well," I'd respond, "of course I am. Everyone does. Everyone has an opinion."
I'm going to start this week out by proposing that everyone is biased, everyone will tend to make allowances for their friends' behavior while castigating the same from someone they don't know or from a social or racial group they dislike. Everyone will review a restaurant owned by their parents differently from one owned by the annoying woman down the block with the loud Mercedes, and everyone will be less likely to use an online service whose director of marketing is a former lover who left for the arms of another.
If you accept this proposal, then our first discussion is going to be about when it's appropriate to identify bias and how to do so in a manner that's fair and transparent. Be warned, though, it's not as simple as what I'm suggesting in the above paragraph either. If my acquaintance's sister's hairdresser starts an online salon and I get wind of it, am I going to be biased in my coverage? Do I need to disclose that relationship?
Before we can get there, however, I ask you, dear IAOC reader: are you biased? How? Or, if you think you aren't, what's your secret for remaining objective?
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Join IAOC
Login
Search
This Month
Month Archive
|
Quick, now, are YOU biased?
Comments
Re: Quick, now, are YOU biased?
Dave,
I would say one of the hallmarks of blogging is bias. Journalists have to stay coolly "objective." (Yeah, right.) The attraction of blogs is that they are warm-blooded. Tell me, how many people enjoy reading the Encyclopædia Britannica? Of course, if blogs mean personality, that begs the question of ghostblogging. And, I'm asking for trouble here but "bias" is not the same as "prejudice." Prejudice is to prejudge... often with no knowledge or basis. To be biased is to be inclined in a certain direction. Morty Re: Re: Quick, now, are YOU biased?
Bias versus prejudice. An interesting differentiation indeed, Morty.
I've always chewed on "pre-judge" as the basis of prejudice, because at some level I think that humans need the ability to assume certain likely behaviors from an otherwise unknown person based on previous experience with similar people. We're drowning in these, from the "jolly" fat man to the "dangerous" street thug. In fact, you can't know how someone behaves until they do so, but that doesn't work very well if that behavior is life-threatening (esp. back when we all carried spears and grunted). Anyway, what that has to do with bias and blogging, I'm not sure. Let me think about that for a bit! :-) Re: Re: Re: Quick, now, are YOU biased?
In Blink, Malcolm Gladwell makes the point that we all have and need a "level of 'unconscious prejudice.' That's the kind of prejudice that you have that you aren't aware of, that affects the kinds of impressions and conclusions that you reach automatically, without thinking." But there's a negative form, such as "racial prejudice...the irrational elevation of race-based considerations over other, equally or more relevant factors." The trick is getting the balance.
Re: Quick, now, are YOU biased?
One of the things I love about blogging is that it's a forum where it's totally ok, even expected, to show my biases. In my case, I have a distinct bias toward social and environmental justice, and toward the idea that ethics works well in business--and my blog on http://www.principledprofit.com/good-business-blog/ allows me to call out injustice and scandal where I encounter them--something that would be much less tolerated in an e-zine and not tolerated at all in a how-to article.
In fact, I hope to eventually parlay my blog into an op-ed column (and actually get paid to rant) ___ I show the world the value in your values! Shel Horowitz, award-wining author, Principled Profit: Marketing That Puts People First Founder of the Business Ethics Pledge, http://www.business-ethics-pledge.org Re: Re: Quick, now, are YOU biased?
You're right, Shel, and that does make blogging an unusual medium for communication in that "traditional" bloggers are blogging because they can have an overt bias. If you work at any other publication or media, you are supposed to hide or subsume your bias unless you're blessed to be involved with the op-ed section...
Re: Quick, now, are YOU biased?
by
Dianna Huff
on Tue 16 Oct 2007 08:11 AM EDT | Permanent Link
Am I biased? Of course I am. I have biases toward all sorts of things -- and sometimes these biases tend toward a judgmental attitude. When I catch myself "judging," that is when I take a step back to ask, "Why am I thinking this way?"
What I like about blogging is that I'm not expected to be am "unbiased" journalist. I'm allowed to state my opinions about things. I read somewhere that bloggers aren't expected to know everything and that one of the benefits of the blogosphere is that someone will correct you if you're wrong. I've been corrected on my blog. I think this transparency keeps us honest. Re: Quick, now, are YOU biased?
Dave,
Welcome! I'm anxious to get to the next stage of this discussion -- getting paid -- so I'll keep my observation on bias brief. There is a difference between someone who is *attempting* to be objective and honest in an account, and someone whose goal is persuasion. Journalism is supposedly a bias toward statements of fact rather than statements of persuasion. Thanks for taking the helm of the blog this week! STEVE O'KEEFE Trackbacks
TrackBack URL: Weblogs that reference this article:
|
IAOC Sponsors Become an IAOCblog.com sponsor Recent Articles
Favorite Blogs
Morty's WordRider Blog |
||||||||||||||||||||||