http://www.iaocblog.org International Association of Online CommunicatorsThu, 04 Jun 2009 21:29:00 +0000hourly1http://wordpress.org/?v=3.9.1 http://www.iaocblog.org/2009/06/03/why-arent-philadelphias-architects-taking-advantage-of-the-web-its-a-case-where-less-is-definitely-not-more/comment-page-1/#comment-907 Thu, 04 Jun 2009 17:29:00 +0000http://www.iaocblog.com/2009/06/03/why-arent-philadelphias-architects-taking-advantage-of-the-web-its-a-case-where-less-is-definitely-not-more/#comment-907This is fascinating and motivational. Thanks for the great research! ]]> http://www.iaocblog.org/2009/04/08/debunking-the-apple-tax/comment-page-1/#comment-906 Wed, 08 Apr 2009 17:26:00 +0000http://www.iaocblog.com/2009/04/08/debunking-the-apple-tax/#comment-906I'm 100% with you on this. Not only is it pretty well false, they're also using actors for these commercials, not the “regular guy” Microsoft is leading you to believe. I think it was Engadget or Gizmodo that ended up tracking down the woman in the initial commercial. I also find it fishy that they're only picking out HP's.
Once you add up all the additions that Apple just simply includes, it can get pretty pricey. Also, there's that whole virus thing. ]]> http://www.iaocblog.org/2009/04/07/rules-for-linkage-requests-a-dialogue-and-case-history/comment-page-1/#comment-905 Tue, 07 Apr 2009 20:48:00 +0000http://www.iaocblog.com/2009/04/07/rules-for-linkage-requests-a-dialogue-and-case-history/#comment-905Thanks for the input, Eric. The pitch should have used Darren's name, and we should have tried to find a personal email address for Darren. We do for most people we pitch, and Darren's is findable. We could have done better. Interesting case history.
STEVE O'KEEFE ]]> http://www.iaocblog.org/2009/04/07/rules-for-linkage-requests-a-dialogue-and-case-history/comment-page-1/#comment-904 Tue, 07 Apr 2009 18:21:00 +0000http://www.iaocblog.com/2009/04/07/rules-for-linkage-requests-a-dialogue-and-case-history/#comment-904Steve, you know I love ya, and respect all you've done over the years, but…that particular link request included a couple strategic choices that I would not have used. Given that you and I are probably the two longest tenured link builders on the web, we should turn this into lemonade together
Eric ]]> http://www.iaocblog.org/2009/03/19/the-police-on-twitter/comment-page-1/#comment-903 Thu, 19 Mar 2009 18:18:00 +0000http://www.iaocblog.com/2009/03/19/the-police-on-twitter/#comment-903On For Immediate Release's last live call-in show, they spoke with someone who works in the Nevada court system and is using Twitter quite effectively, I understand: http://www.forimmediaterelease.biz ]]> http://www.iaocblog.org/2009/03/06/media-literacy-and-south-park/comment-page-1/#comment-902 Fri, 06 Mar 2009 07:09:00 +0000http://www.iaocblog.com/2009/03/06/media-literacy-and-south-park/#comment-902In regards to one medium, television, many people expect parents and family to educate children. Does this always happen? In my belief absolutely not. This I feel is for many reasons. Parents and families aren't qualified to do so. And, they don't have the time, don't feel they should, don't want to because of laziness, or a host of other reasons that sociologists should study. ]]> http://www.iaocblog.org/2009/03/04/daily-show-addresses-the-old-medias-take-on-twitter/comment-page-1/#comment-901 Wed, 04 Mar 2009 07:08:40 +0000http://www.iaocblog.com/2009/03/04/daily-show-addresses-the-old-medias-take-on-twitter/#comment-901I find it absolutely amazing that a cable comedy show can broadcast so many true potential social issues about new technological fads, blanketed in a hilarious rhetoric. ]]> http://www.iaocblog.org/2009/03/02/to-all-my-twittering-brethren/comment-page-1/#comment-900 Tue, 03 Mar 2009 23:42:44 +0000http://www.iaocblog.com/2009/03/02/to-all-my-twittering-brethren/#comment-900don't follow Pirillo. He is the man behind this video (which scares the living daylights out of me)
http://www.funnyordie.com/videos/f816858620/disappointed-dogs-in-star-wars-costumes-from-that-happened ]]> http://www.iaocblog.org/2009/02/15/e-evidence-firm-judged-harshly-for-absent-e-evidence/comment-page-1/#comment-899 Wed, 18 Feb 2009 08:56:00 +0000http://www.iaocblog.com/2009/02/15/e-evidence-firm-judged-harshly-for-absent-e-evidence/#comment-899Chris-
Good post. I am the attorney who represented Cassondra Todd against Guidance Software. I agree that an obligation to search back-up tapes as part of the customary discovery process would not be reasonable as such documents on back-up would not be considered “reasonably accessible” under the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. In our case, however, the judge determined that Guidance had not complied with its initial discovery obligations. Facing the possibility of having the judge entered default in Ms. Todd's favor, Guidance claimed that it could not comply with its disccovery obligations because a year earlier (shortly after Ms. Todd's termination) it has experienced a massive corruption of its email database. At the time of the alleged data corruption Guidance had no formal back-up policy and undertook no recovery efforts. The judge determined that Guidance's failure to have a back-up policy in place and the fact that it undertook no recovery efforts at the point of corruption consituted gross negligence. It was only as part of a discovery sanctions order after these factual findings, did the judge order Guidance to search whatever back-up tapes it did have. It was not part of Guidance's initial discovery obligations. Thank for your allowing me to clarify this.
Arnold Peter
http://www.raskinpeter.com ]]> http://www.iaocblog.org/2009/02/13/paul-duguid-interview/comment-page-1/#comment-898 Sun, 15 Feb 2009 14:59:00 +0000http://www.iaocblog.com/2009/02/13/paul-duguid-interview/#comment-898This is a TEST Comment
Salman Khan
Salman Khan
http://www.google.com/ ]]>